This is a continuation of the previous History of Social Media blogs, and you can read Part I here and Part II here.

This one is rather less fun than the others, but does contain a useful bibliography at the end. Press on, I say, press on!


Recho: Recorded Echo. Launched in 2014, Recho is a SNS that allows users to build a limited profile, find connections, create lists, and search for others by their names, connections, or hashtags. Much like Bubbly, there have been voice-recording based SNS previously, but Recho stands out by geolocating the recordings. The tagline of the company is “Some stories belong to a place” and it states that “The site-specific dogma benefits the user experience as content automatically contextualizes itself with its surroundings. The possibility to leave digital sounds in physical places simply lets you relate to content in a new way” (Recho 2015). Users of the free service can record voice recordings of up to 30 seconds. The recording is tied to the physical location, within fifteen metres. Other users or friends must then go to the place where the Recho has been dropped to be able to hear it. Once a user listens to a Recho, it can be stored in the app for replaying later.

With easy integration into other SNS such as Facebook and Twitter, Recho has made use of larger sites to draw in users who may like to explore its features. Recho also offers four different account types which vary in price. For a fee the Plus account allows the user to place Rechos on a map using the site’s interface. These Rechos work much like the free version’s except that Plus users can record, edit, and export Rechos as mp3s that have a limitless duration. The Pro account, which has a significantly higher price, offers in-app branding, consultations, and all the bells and whistles. For companies and users who want a special service, they can choose the Enterprise package that gives users full rights to all content, custom user interface, and a custom App in the App store. Regardless of which version you choose, Recho offers users a new way to tell stories by tying them to a physical place, a feature that is sure to influence future SNS and the way users experience creative outlets.

If Recho is about geolocating sound, Space Tag (spacetag.me) is about geolocating written notes. The idea behind Space Tag is for users to sign up, connect with each other and to snap photos and leave notes in a location. These notes can then be shared on a user’s social network, shared with connections or just left hanging in the location for others to come across. To find the notes, a user can utlises the app, which takes advantage of the phone camera to scan a location and find virtual green dots which indicate that a note has been left. If that’s too much effort, users can use the map feature, to locate nearby notes and go there to see them. Though Space Tag has been listed as one of Forbes Top Fifteen Social Networks to Watch in 2015, it is still in beta mode and rather buggy. It currently promises to do for images and notes what Recho is doing for sound, but until it upgrades, it is in danger of being overtaken by similar geographically-based SNS and social networking apps (SNA) such as Traces, Skychalk, PopNotes from well-known brand Post-It, and Findery.

Findery was founded by Caterina Fake, who was a founder of Flickr. Run in beta since 2012 (then previously known as Pinwheel), Findery is the “Treasure map to your life” (Findery 2015) that allows users to sign up, create a profile, search for connections, follow other users and to create, leave, and find notes around the world. The site was launched quietly in order to avoid what Fake calls “’empty restaurant’ syndrome” (Cited in Taylor, C. 2014) and to ensure that there was plenty of content for when the site opened to the public. It is a strategy that seems to have worked. Findery works together with other SNS, such as Twitter and Facebook, to seamlessly integrate into a user’s life. Notes can include supported items from Instagram, YouTube, Flickr, Vimeo, and Soundcloud. Currently, Findery is biding their time developing revenue streams, and it will be interesting to see how it is able to monetise its data and services and how that will change interaction with its user base.

The rise of geolocational, social networking apps shows no sign of slowing as we head into the future. In the early part of 2015, two social networking apps, Meerkat and Periscope launched to provide a way stream live videos from anywhere in the world. They work in slightly different ways. Meerkat is tied seamlessly into your Twitter account. You log into Meerkat, you type whatever you want in the text field and click ‘stream’. From there the text you entered will go out as a Tweet and whatever the camera on your phone is pointed at will be streamed live via Twitter. People can also respond to your live stream, which shows up in your Twitter feed as replies. These live feeds are truly live and ephemeral, and once the streaming has ended, the feed is no longer available. You can save the feed or photo to your phone, but these will be available only to you and not to your followers at large. Geek Wire author Mónica Guzmán summarised it the draw of Meerkat by saying, “Why take a picture or post 140 characters? If you want people to see the world through your eyes, just go ahead and let them” (2015).

After Meerkat launched and started to grow, its life force, Twitter, limited the company’s access to Twitter’s social graph. Twitter still allow Meerkat users to post to their Twitter feed, but it keeps the Meerkat app from automatically converting a user’s Twitter followers to the people they follow in the Meerkat app and it could limit the ‘live’ streaming. Though this might not kill Meerkat as a SNA, it will hinder its growth in the coming months.

One of the reasons that Twitter put the brakes on Meerkat is that they purchased newcomer SNA Periscope, which, essentially does the same thing as Meerkat. Launched in April of 2015, Periscope had one million users in its first ten days. It was live for less than two weeks before Twitter snapped it up. Their tagline of “Explore the world through someone else’s eyes” (Periscope 2015) is as close as the developers could get to teleportation, allowing users to stream live feeds from anywhere in the world. Unlike Meerkat, Periscope doesn’t automatically tweet your live stream. And, users have the option of saving streams and watching them again for a twenty-four hour period. Users can live stream from their phone and they and their viewers can comment live on the stream. In addition, users can follow others, get notifications, and build a community around topics, themes and other users.

With the new arrival of live-streaming SNA, it is only a matter of time before they are more fully integrated into everyone’s lives. Celebrities, Hollywood, and the music industry have all started to embrace live streaming apps as a way to build a stronger connection with their audiences. However, some people are fully against it, such as the National Hockey League, who recently banned the use of both Meerkat and Periscope.

In the coming months, there will be more people joining Meerkat and Periscope as they gain international popularity, and this will change the way that news corporations and publishers negotiate the digitally social environment. As Guzmán notes, “You don’t capture moments on Meerkat [or Periscope]. You free them. In that sense, other kinds of social media are middlemen” (2015). Middlemen or not, the rise of SNS and SNA will provide endless opportunities and trials for publishers. If they choose to ignore the influence of social media platforms, they run the very real risk of alienating their current audiences and ignoring an unfathomably large pool of potential writers and readers.

This will be added to as I go on in my research, so watch this space.

 

Bibliography: Lit Review Bush, R., 1993. FidoNet: Technology, Use, Tools, and History. [online] Available at http://www.fidonet.org/inet92_Randy_Bush.txt [Accessed March 18, 2015].

The History of Social Networking, 2015. Digital Trends. [online] Available at http://www.digitaltrends.com/features/the-history-of-social-networking/ [Accessed 09 September 2014].

Keitzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K, McCathy, I. P. and Silvestre, B. S., 2011. Social Media? Get Serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media. Business Horizons (54), pp.241-251.

Kemp, S. 2014, Digital Statshot 001: A Compendium of Global Digital Statistics. We Are Social. [slideshare] 03 November 2014. Available at http://www.slideshare.net/wearesocialsg/we-are-socials-digital-statshot-002 [Accessed 05 November 2014].

The Globe, 2009. About Us. [online] Available at http://www.theglobe.com/index.html. Accessed on 05 April 2015.

The Washington Post, 2010. 25 Years of AOL: A Timeline. [online] The Washington Post. Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/23/AR2010052303551.html. Accessed on 08 April 2015.

Plymale, S., 2012. A Forefather of Social Media: Andrew Weinrich and SixDegrees.com. [online] Michigan: Eastern Michigan University: Public Relations Student Society of America. Available at http://emuprssa.com/2012/05/26/a-forefather-of-social-media-andrew-weinreich-and-sixdegrees-com/. Accessed on 08 April 2015.

LiveJournal, 2015. About Us: Our Company. [online] Available at http://www.livejournal.com/about. Accessed on 08 April 2015.

Blogger, 2015. The Story of Blogger. [online] Available at https://www.blogger.com/about. Accessed on 09 April 2015

Martin, E., 2014. The Future of Branding is Experience. Branding Magazine. [online] Available at http://www.brandingmagazine.com/2014/02/01/future-branding-user-experience/. Accessed on 25 May 2015.

Wherle, T., 2014. Teaching digital natives: Preservice teacher preparedness to use technology in the classroom. PhD. Edgewood College.

Thompson, P., 2013. The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers and Education 65 (2013). [online] Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131513000225. Accessed on 28 May 2015.

Veira, A., Leacock, C. & Warrican, S.J., 2014. Learning outside the walls of the classroom: Engaging the digital natives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. [online] Vol. 30, No. 2. Available at http://ascilite.org.au/ajet/submission/index.php/AJET/article/view/349. Accessed on 28 may 2015.

Fiegerman, S., 2014. Friendster Founder Tells His Side of the Story, 10 Years After Facebook. Mashable.[online] Available at http://mashable.com/2014/02/03/jonathan-abrams-friendster-facebook/. Accessed on 09 April 2015.

Gannes, L., 2010. Facebook Buys Friendster Patents for $40 Million. Gigaom.com. [online] Available at https://gigaom.com/2010/08/04/facebook-buys-friendster-patents-for-40m/. Accessed on 08 April 2015.

Gillette, F., 2011. The Rise and Inglorious Fall of MySpace. Bloomberg Business. [online] Available at http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/magazine/content/11_27/b4235053917570.htm. Accessed on 08 April 2015.

Savitz, E., 2012. LinkedIn to Buy SlideShare for $118.75 Million; Q1 Crushes Estimates. Forbes. [online] Available at slideshare-for-118-75m-q1-crushes-estimates/. Accessed on 08 April 2015.

Veinberg, S., 2014. Digital Native’s Attitudes Toward News Sources. Public Relations Review 41. [online] Available here: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811114001647#. Accessed on 26 May 2015.

Zeevie, D., 2013. The Ultimate History of Facebook (Inforgraphic). Social Media Today. [online] Available at infographic. Accessed on 10 April 2015.

Hoffman, C., 2008. The Battle for Facebook. Rolling Stone Issue 1055. [online] Available at http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/the-battle-for-facebook-20100915?page=6. Accessed on 08 April 2015.

Facebook, 2015. About Facebook. [online] Available at https://www.facebook.com/facebook/info?tab=page_info. Accessed on 08 April 2015.

Kirkpatrick, D., 2010. The Facebook effect : The inside story of the company that is connecting the world. London: Virgin. Seidman, G., 2012. Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 402-407.

Lacy, S. (2008). The Stories of Facebook, YouTube & Myspace : The people, the hype and the deals behind the giants of Web 2.0. Richmond: Crimson.

Wright, K. & Webb, L. eds., 2010. Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships. Bern: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

Brügger, N., 2015. A Brief History of Facebook as a Media Text: The Development of an Empty Structure. First Monday, Vol. 20 No. 5. [online] Available at http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5423/4466. Accessed on 28 May 2015.

Burke, M & Kraut, R., 2014. Growing closer on facebook: changes in tie strength through social network site use. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4187-4196. [online] Available at http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557094. Accessed on 28 May 2015.

Barajin, B., Quoted in BBC Business. 2014. Facebook to Buy Messaging App WhatsApp for $19 Billion. [online] Available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-26266689. Accessed on 09 April 2015.

Quantcast, 2015. Top Sites for the UK. [online] Available at https://www.quantcast.com/top-sites/GB/1. Accessed on May 03 2015.

Flickr, 2015. About Flickr. [online] Available at https://www.flickr.com/about. Accessed on 03 May 2015.

Dixler, H., 2014. Yelp Turns 10: From Startup to Online Review Dominance. Eater.com. [online] Available at http://www.eater.com/2014/8/5/6177213/yelp-turns-10-from-startup-to-online-review-dominance. Accessed on 03 May 2015.

YouTube. 2015. About YoutTube. Youtube.com. [online] Available at https://www.youtube.com/yt/about/. Accessed on 03 May 2015.

Association of Research Libraries, 2015. Copyright Timeline: A History of Copyright in the United States. [online] Available at http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/copyright-ip/2486-copyright-timeline#.VUCoTqZnszw. Accessed on 03 May 2015.

Griffen, A., 2014. Bebo comes back: mid-Noughties social network returns as hyperactive messaging app. The Independent. [online] Available at http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/bebo-comes-back-midnoughties-social-network-comes-back-as-hyperactive-messaging-app-9932554.html. Accessed on 03 May 2015.

Cashmore, P., 2006. MyChurch – The Facebook of Churches. Mashable.com. [online] Available at http://mashable.com/2006/08/25/mychurch-the-facebook-of-churches/. Accessed on 03 May 2015.

Dorsey, J., 2006. Just setting up my twttr. [Twitter] March 21. Available at https://twitter.com/jack/status/20 Accessed on 04 May 2015.

Blanchard, O., 2008. Social Media Stats and Demographics for 2008. The BrandBuilder Blog. [online] Available at https://thebrandbuilder.wordpress.com/2008/12/29/social-media-stats-and-demographics-for-2008/. Accessed on 05 May 2015.

Tumblr, 2015. About Tubmlr. [online] Available at https://www.tumblr.com/about. Accessed on 05 May 2015.

Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M. & Matsuo, Y., 2010. Earthquake Shakes Twitter: Real-Time Event Detection By Social Sensors. [online] Available at http://www.ymatsuo.com/papers/www2010.pdf. Accessed on 05 May 2015.

Bubbly, 2015. Home Page. [online] Available at http://bubbly.net/. Accessed on 05 May 2015.

Dash, A., 2013. On Location With Foursquare. Medium. [online] Available at https://medium.com/the-web-we-make/on-location-with-foursquare-4da683ec77b6. Accessed on 06 May 2015.

Popper, B. & Hamburger, E. 2014. Meet Swarm: Foursquare’s Ambitious Plan to Split Its App In Two. The Verge [online] Available at http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/1/5666062/foursquare-swarm-new-app. Accessed on 06 May 2015.

Diallo, A., 2014. Instagram Passes 300 Million Users. Forbes. [online] Available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/amadoudiallo/2014/12/10/instagram-passes-300-million-users/. Accessed on 06 May 2015.

Duggan, M., Ellison, N., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A. & Madden, M., 2014. Demographics of Key Social Networking Platforms. Pew Research Center. [online] Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/demographics-of-key-social-networking-platforms-2/. Accessed on 06 May 2015.

Colao, J., 2014. The Inside Story of Snapchat: The World’s Hottest App or a $3 Billion Disappearing Act? Forbes. [online] Available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/jjcolao/2014/01/06/the-inside-story-of-snapchat-the-worlds-hottest-app-or-a-3-billion-disappearing-act/3/. Accessed on 06 May 2015.

Bercovici, J., 2014. Inside Pinterest: The Coming Ad Colossus That Could Dwarf Twitter and Facebook. Forbes. [online] Available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2014/10/15/inside-pinterest-the-coming-ad-colossus-that-could-dwarf-twitter-and-facebook/. Accessed on 06 May 2015.

Faktor, S., 2014. What Killed Google+ and What Can Save It. Forbes. [online] Available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevefaktor/2014/05/01/what-killed-google-and-what-will-save-it/2/. Accessed on 06 May 2015.

Kuittinen, T., 2013. Vine Is Taking Over America. BRG. [online] Available at http://bgr.com/2013/05/30/vine-app-growth-analysis-iphone/. Accessed on 06 May 2015.

Ello, 2015. What Is Ello? [online] Available at https://ello.co/wtf/post/about-ello. Accessed on 06 May 2015.

Recho, 2015. About. [online] Available at https://ello.co/wtf/post/about-ello. Accessed on 06 May 2015.

Findery, 2015. Home Page. [online] Available at https://findery.com. Accessed on 06 May 2015.

Taylor, C., 2014. Ager 2 Years In Beta, Findery Launches Its Geo-Tagged Story Sharing App On iOS Worldwide. Tech Crunch. [online] Available at http://techcrunch.com/2014/03/06/after-2-years-in-beta-findery-launches-its-geo-tagged-story-sharing-app-on-ios-worldwide/. Accessed on 07 May 2015.

Guzmán, M., 2015. Why Meerkat and Other Live Video Apps Are Going to Succeed. Geekwire. [online] Available at http://www.geekwire.com/2015/why-meerkat-is-going-to-make-it/. Accessed on 07 May 2015.

Periscope, 2015. Home Page. [online] Available at https://www.periscope.tv/. Accessed on 07 May 2015.

O’Reilly, T., 2005. What is Web 2.0? [online] Available at http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html?page=5. Accessed on 07 May 2015.

Kemp, S. 2014. Digital Statshot 001: A Compendium of Global Digital Statistics. We Are Social, [slideshare] 03 November 2014. Available at    http://www.slideshare.net/wearesocialsg/we-are-socials-digital-statshot-002 [Accessed 05 November 2014].

Deuze, M., Blank, P. & Speers, L., 2012. A Life Lived In Media. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, Vol. 6., No. 1. [online] Available at http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/6/1/000110/000110.html. Accessed on 07 May 2015.

 Palfey, J. & Gasser, U., 2008. Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. Basic Books: New York.

Bennett, S. J., Maton, K. A. & Kervin, L. K., 2008. The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (5), 775-786.

Qualman, Erik. Socialnomics: How Social Media Transforms the Way We Live and Do Business. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. 2011.

Business Wire, 2010. Digital Birth: Welcome to the Online World. [online] Available at libweb.anglia.ac.uk/referencing/harvard.htm. Accessed on 15 May 2015.

Kirk, C., Chiagouris, L., Lala, V. & Thomas, J.D.E., 2015. How Do Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants Respond Differently to Interactivity Online? A Model for Predicting Consumer Attitudes and Intentions to Use Digital Information Products. Journal of Advertising Research, March 2015. [online] Available here. Accessed on 15 May 2015.

Boyd, D. & Ellison, N., 2008. Social Networking Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, pp 210-230.

Digital Publishing News, 2015. New Survey Finds Millennial Readers Clinging to Print. Digital Book World. [online] Available at http://www.digitalbookworld.com/2015/new-survey-finds-millennial-readers-clinging-to-print/. Accessed on 29 May 2015.

Zickuhr, K. & Rainie, L., 2014. E-Reading Rises as Device Ownership Jumps. Pew Research Center. [online]. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/01/16/e-reading-rises-as-device-ownership-jumps/. Accessed on 28 May 2015.

_______ 2014. E-Reading Rises as Device Ownership Jumps. Pew Research Center. [online]. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/01/16/a-snapshot-of-reading-in-america-in-2013/. Accessed on 28 May 2015.